Strategi Verifikasi dan Kalibrasi Keyakinan Mahasiswa Baru Calon Guru Fisika dalam Menilai Solusi Soal Materi Turunan Berkonteks Fisika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v16i5.5168Keywords:
Calon Guru Fisika, Turunan, Verifikasi Solusi, Contoh Keliru, Kalibrasi KeyakinanAbstract
Calon guru fisika perlu mampu mengenali solusi yang benar secara prosedural tetapi tidak sahih secara fisis. Penelitian deskriptif ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kesalahan yang dideteksi mahasiswa calon guru fisika semester pertama pada solusi soal materi turunan berkonteks fisika, strategi pemeriksaan yang mereka gunakan, kalibrasi keyakinan, serta kesesuaian kebiasaan memeriksa yang dilaporkan dengan perilaku yang teramati. Sebanyak 14 mahasiswa menilai tujuh solusi; enam memuat satu kesalahan pada lapis prosedur, satuan dan representasi numerik, makna fisis, atau batas berlakunya model, dan satu solusi benar sebagai kontrol. Satu-satunya kesalahan yang terdeteksi adalah kesalahan koefisien turunan (6 dari 14 mahasiswa). Tidak ada mahasiswa yang mendeteksi aturan hasil kali yang tidak lengkap, kesalahan mode sudut kalkulator, salah tafsir makna turunan, maupun penggunaan model di luar domainnya. Menghitung ulang mendominasi strategi pemeriksaan (62 dari 98 jawaban), dan sebagian mahasiswa menerima solusi yang tidak mereka pahami. Keyakinan mahasiswa berlebih (bias kalibrasi 0,65), dan tidak satu pun mahasiswa yang mengaku rutin memeriksa satuan mendeteksi kesalahan satuan. Pembelajaran turunan bagi calon guru fisika perlu melatih pemeriksaan satuan, makna fisis, dan batas berlakunya model secara eksplisit.
Downloads
References
Adams, D. M., McLaren, B. M., Durkin, K., Mayer, R. E., Rittle-Johnson, B., Isotani, S., & van Velsen, M. (2014). Using erroneous examples to improve mathematics learning with a web-based tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.053
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Akinyemi, A. R., Loverude, M. E., & Thompson, J. R. (2025). Solution evaluation strategies used by first-year physics students. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/rsh8-1ftk
Amos, N. R., Harris, D., & Hutchinson, J. (2020). Excerpts from an exploratory survey of units/dimensional analysis in introductory physics. 2020 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Amos
Carli, M., Lippiello, S., Pantano, O., Perona, M., & Tormen, G. (2020). Testing students ability to use derivatives, integrals, and vectors in a purely mathematical context and in a physical context. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010111
Christensen, W. M., & Thompson, J. R. (2012). Investigating graphical representations of slope and derivative without a physics context. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 8(2), 023101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.023101
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Dieterich, S., Rumann, S., & Rodemer, M. (2025). Conditions for effective learning from erroneous examples: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 37, 94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10071-x
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention. Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003
Große, C. S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.008
Hajerina, H., Suciati, I., & Mailili, W. H. (2022). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa pada mata kuliah kalkulus diferensial materi turunan. EQUALS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.46918/equals.v5i1.1238
Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.002
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
Kuo, E., Hull, M. M., Elby, A., & Gupta, A. (2020). Assessing mathematical sensemaking in physics through calculation-concept crossover. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020109
Larrain, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Interpretation of students’ errors as part of the diagnostic competence of pre-service primary school teachers. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik, 43(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-022-00198-7
Lingel, K., Lenhart, J., & Schneider, W. (2019). Metacognition in mathematics: Do different metacognitive monitoring measures make a difference? ZDM – Mathematics Education, 51(4), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8
Mahlaba, S. C. (2026). How preservice teachers evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT-generated solutions of curriculum-based mathematical word problems in a self-directed context. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1783496
McMurran, M., Weisbart, D., & Atit, K. (2023). The relationship between students’ gender and their confidence in the correctness of their solutions to complex and difficult mathematics problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 107, 102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102349
Meika, I., Sartika, N. S., Sujana, A., Jarinah, J., Hakim, Z., Windiarti, I. S., & Hendra, H. (2025). E-didactics design of differential calculus based on TPACK to overcome learning obstacles for mathematics pre-service teachers. Infinity Journal, 14(3), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i3.p733-752
Odden, T. O. B., & Russ, R. S. (2019). Defining sensemaking: Bringing clarity to a fragmented theoretical construct. Science Education, 103(1), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21452
Pankow, L., Kaiser, G., Busse, A., König, J., Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., & Döhrmann, M. (2016). Early career teachers’ ability to focus on typical students errors in relation to the complexity of a mathematical topic. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 48(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0763-2
Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology. Science & Education, 24(5–6), 561–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
Rusyda, N. A., Rifandi, R., Musdi, E., & Rusdinal, R. (2022). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah kalkulus pada materi turunan berdasarkan Newman’s error analysis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1514–1523. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.5093
Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
Sherin, B. L. (2001). How students understand physics equations. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 479–541. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1904_3
Testa, I., Colantonio, A., Galano, S., Marzoli, I., Trani, F., & Scotti di Uccio, U. (2020). Effects of instruction on students’ overconfidence in introductory quantum mechanics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010143. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010143
Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020101
Van den Eynde, S., Goedhart, M., Deprez, J., & De Cock, M. (2023). Role of graphs in blending physical and mathematical meaning of partial derivatives in the context of the heat equation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10237-3
Yerushalmi, E., Cohen, E., Mason, A., & Singh, C. (2012). What do students do when asked to diagnose their mistakes? Does it help them? I. An atypical quiz context. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020109
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afiq Agung, Marwan Marwan, Miftahul Jannah, Fauziah A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Seluruh materi yang terdapat dalam situs ini dilindungi oleh undang-undang. Dilarang mengutip sebagian atau seluruh isi situs web ini untuk keperluan komersil tanpa persetujuan dewan penyunting jurnal ini.
- Apabila anda menemukan satu atau beberapa artikel yang terdapat dalam Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA yang melanggar atau berpotensi melanggar hak cipta yang anda miliki, silahkan laporkan kepada kami, melalui email pada Principle Contact.
- Aspek legal formal terhadap akses setiap informasi dan artikel yang tercantum dalam situs jurnal ini mengacu pada ketentuan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Semua Informasi yang terdapat di Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA bersifat akademik. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kerugian yang terjadi karana penyalah gunaan informasi dari situs ini.
