Integrasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal Nggahi Rawi Pahu dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu: Sebuah Kajian Cultural Governance

Authors

  • Gazali Gazali Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Ahmad Muhasim Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37630/jpi.v16i3.4226

Keywords:

Nggahi Rawi Pahu, Kearifan Lokal, Pemerintahan Daerah, Budaya Kerja, Pelayanan Publik, Dompu

Abstract

Nggahi Rawi Pahu merupakan falsafah kearifan lokal masyarakat Dompu yang mengandung prinsip keselarasan antara ucapan dan tindakan, serta menekankan pentingnya integritas, kejujuran, dan tanggung jawab. Dalam konteks pemerintahan modern, nilai ini memiliki relevansi strategis sebagai landasan etis dalam tata kelola yang berorientasi pada transparansi, akuntabilitas, dan pelayanan publik yang berkeadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi nilai Nggahi Rawi Pahu dalam sistem pemerintahan Kabupaten Dompu serta mengidentifikasi faktor pendukung dan penghambat penerapannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif–interpretatif, melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan analisis dokumen. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa internalisasi nilai Nggahi Rawi Pahu telah muncul dalam budaya kerja aparatur, pelayanan publik, pengelolaan lingkungan, serta penguatan regulasi. Namun, sejumlah tantangan tetap muncul, seperti keterbatasan anggaran, resistensi sebagian aparat, dan ketimpangan pelaksanaan antarwilayah. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa Nggahi Rawi Pahu berpotensi menjadi modal sosial dan etika pemerintahan apabila dilembagakan melalui kebijakan formal, pendidikan budaya, serta partisipasi masyarakat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfina, A., & Utama, A. A. G. S. (2024). Ethical Organizational Governance: Understanding and Applying Local Wisdom in Creating the Organizational Climate. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 37, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.55549/epess.861

Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action (1st ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747482.001.0001

Anggraini, A., Apriliani, E., Sari, P. A., Danti, R. R., & Prasetyo, E. (2024). Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance dalam Pelayanan Publik Online Sobat Dukcapil Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Publik, 18(02), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v18i02.361

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Ardiana, P. A., Sujana, I. K., Natalia, S. A. P. D., & Yanthi, K. D. L. (2026). Tri Hita Karana: Balinese local wisdom and its role in the triumph over corruption. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 22(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2023-0182

Aspinall, E., & Fealy, G. (Eds.). (2003). Local power and politics in Indonesia: Decentralisation & democratisation. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Bisogno, M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Rossi, F. M., & Peña-Miguel, N. (2023). Sustainable development goals in public administrations: Enabling conditions in local governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(4), 1223–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221146458

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education. Pearson.

Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. (world). https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465

Braun, V., & and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cordella, A., & Paletti, A. (2019). Government as a platform, orchestration, and public value creation: The Italian case. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101409

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709765

Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Simon and Schuster.

Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Geertz. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Hutchison.

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press.

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The Effect of Transparency on Trust in Government: A Cross-National Comparative Experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047

Habermas, J. (2015). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. John Wiley & Sons.

Hadiz, V. R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford University Press.

Hamzah, S., Azis, A., & Faradilla. (2025). ISLAM DAN BUDAYA LOKAL. Rihlah: Jurnal Sejarah dan Kebudayaan, 13(02), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.24252/rihlah.v13i02.61677

Ibrahim, A. H. H. (2024). Decentralization and its impact on improving public services. International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijss.v7n2.2278

Iman, M. M., Alfitri, A., Thamrin, M. H., & Alamsyah, A. (2025). INTEGRATION OF NEW PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND LOCAL WISDOM IN PUBLIC SERVICES AT THE SUB-DISTRICT LEVEL: A CASE STUDY OF MUSI RAWAS REGENCY. Natapraja, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21831/natapraja.v13i1.83388

Imelda, C., Hasanuddin, H., & Waliadin, W. (2026). Integrasi Nilai Budaya Lokal dalam Pelayanan Publik Digital: Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Bangsa, 2(8), 1438–1445. https://doi.org/10.59837/jpnmb.v2i8.712

Irwan, A. L., Naping, H., Yani, A. A., & Nassa, M. K. J. (2020). Local values of Buginese Culture in the practice of government organizations in Sinjai. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 5(1), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.10397

Klitgaard, R. (2009). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.

Koentjaraningrat. (2000). Kebudayaan, mentalitas dan pembangunan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitive research interviewing. SAGE.

Laurens, S. (2025). PUBLIC SERVICE INNOVATION BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM: A BEST PRACTICE STUDY IN REGIONAL AREAS. JURNAL BADATI, 8(2).

Lee, Y. (2021). Government for Leaving No One Behind: Social Equity in Public Administration and Trust in Government. Sage Open, 11(3), 21582440211029227. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211029227

Lvi-strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press.

Mirayanti, M., Mas’ud, M., Sinring, B., Ramlawati, R., Kahar, Abd., & Fiansi, F. (2025). The illusion of meritocracy: A critical analysis of open selection for senior leadership in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2484472. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2484472

Mujahidin, M., & Kusuma, F. K. (2025). Redesigning Bureaucracy as a Governmental Strategy for Enhancing Public Service Effectiveness. Society, 13(1), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.766

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2023). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.

Rahmatiani, L. (2016). NILAI KEARIFAN LOKAL SUNDA SEBAGAI BASIS TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK (GOOD GOVERNANCE). CIVICS: Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.36805/civics.v1i1.30

Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041508X12911362383354

Scharpf, F. W. (2002). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford University Press.

Schwarz, G., Richter, U. H., Shirodkar, V., & Esho, E. (2025). Unethical Pro–Organizational Behavior and Employee Performance in Côte d’Ivoire: The Effects of Leader–Member Exchange and Affective Organizational Commitment. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(7), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2367032

Siahaan, A., Silalahi, H. A., & Siregar, E. R. (2025). PENTINGNYA BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN SISTEM PENGENDALIAN MANAJEMEN TERHADAP EFEKTIVITAS KERJA. JMRI Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.61240/jmri.v3i1.99

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Sumada, I. M. (2017). PERANAN KEARIFAN LOKAL BALI DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Komunikasi, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.34010/jipsi.v7i1.337

Tinri, M. D. N. (2025). Peran Kearifan Lokal Dalam Tata Kelola Kebijakan Publik Desa: Studi Fenomenologis Di Desa Moncongloe. Reflection Journal, 5(2), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v5i2.3656

Trimurni, F., Aisyah, D., Tambusay, M. D. E., & Sihombing, S. M. (2025). Peran Kearifan Budaya Lokal dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Desa Pesisir (Studi Kasus di Desa Nenassiam, Kabupaten Batubara). SAJJANA: Public Administration Review, 3(01), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.32734/sajjana.v3i01.21023

Villiers, D. E. de. (2015). In search of an appropriate contemporary approach in Christian ethics: Max Weber’s ethic of responsibility as resource. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 71(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v71i1.2948

Wagenaar, H. (2014). Meaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315702476

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Univ of California Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-10